Mon premier blog

Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament Jason David BeDuhn
Publisher: University Press of America

There used to be a pdf of his first draft available online, but I believe he removed it when he published his book “Bias in New Testament Translations?”. Likewise, "a god" is the simple, literal, and accurate translation of ou.noute at John 1:1c, the same Coptic indefinite article + common noun construction as found in John 1:6 and elsewhere. Only with 3 - That, whereas some Coptic grammarians hold that ou.noute may also be translated into English adjectivally as "divine," they give no examples favoring this usage in the Sahidic Coptic New Testament itself. I have found it to be the most accurate. As an English speaking[&thinking] person, Professor of Biblical Languages. He is theo author of the book "Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament." In this book, while critical of some points of translation, he says that overall the NWT is very accurate. Certain Bible critics try to say that it's not and criticize the NW translation. So it goes with all the new English translations of the bible – there are no 'new translations' of the Torah in Hebrew are there? Book: “TRUTH IN TRANSLATION: ACCURACY AND BIAS IN ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT”. It is a comment on the book Truth in Translation. #iambibledude · Home » worldviews » the truth about Jehovah's Witness, part 1 ..